Do U.S. Servicemen enjoy Declaration of Independence rights? Or are they slaves of the deep state?
For US Servicemen Declaration of Independence Does Not Exist: Service Members's First Amendment freedoms, as we know them, are withdrawn since 1953
Supreme Court in 1953. Ruling in Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953), the Court said: “The military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian. Orderly government requires that the judiciary be as scrupulous not to interfere with legitimate Army matters as the Army must be scrupulous not to intervene in judicial matters.”
The American Declaration of Independence
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
U.S. Servicemen were Denied Declaration of Independence rights and made slaves of the deep state
Who says slavery, existence of groups of modern human with reduced rights, ended in the world, in 1953 it was legalized once again:
It s obvious that Supreme Court in 1953. Ruling in Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953)was a new introduction but the language portrays something normal, why this betrayal? Where is any debate for and against introduction of such a radical change and these new concepts "Military necessity" concept and its scope if it exists or is important?
What is being described, exemplified or confused here "judiciary be as scrupulous not to interfere with legitimate Army matters as the Army must be scrupulous not to intervene in judicial matters" . There are no two opinions about resolving any dispute with as much fairness, consideration to find facts and restore justice as possible. But see how this principle is being confused here and supreme court is sending a message that once you are with the slaveholders, it is legitimate whatever they do with you Bye Bye.
Nobody even supreme court can exclude any American citizen/military-conscript from "We the People".
The preamble to the constitution reminds the spirit of the constitution:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The articles after the constitution are not privileges but guides and means to the mission of the preamble and declaration of independence. A common sense look at the declaration and preamble is enough to expect supreme court should have stated to confirm its responsibility to establish justice such as: it would fight for ensuring that justice is established everywhere and for all citizens equally. It is clearly against the spirit of the declaration, preamble to the constitution and the First Amendment that: "judiciary be as scrupulous not to interfere with legitimate Army matters". The spirit of the declaration, preamble and First Amendment requires a statement like this: supreme court will not lose any opportunity to confirm its commitment to establish the intended objectives of the declaration, preamble to the constitution and the First Amendment that it will be extremely scrupulous to interfere with any person anywhere in US or abroad for its citizens to establish justice without discrimination.
Declaration does not allow any discrimination among citizens that takes away parts of their "unalienable Rights" that establish their equality which is endowed by their Creator.
Thus statements like: "The military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian." can only represent pre-Declaration times not after it was declared "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
US Military or Mercenaries What is the Difference?
Can The People Who Voluntarily Forgo Their Own Human Rights Help Deliver Such Rights to Others? Including their fellow countryman
Deception Deceit of the Top to Runaway From the responsibility of their actions taken by freewill and scapegoating lower ranks, who are denied human right of conscientious decent.
It only requires common sense to understand that the Supreme Court acted as an instrument for transforming the service organization as a mechanical machine where only the top will have the control, trigger. However it is not admitted, why?
In the words of a blogger Brandon Smith,"American soldiers are indeed property of the state, that their actions must be dictated by the president and not the Constitution, and that this is required for the military to function."
US has "relegated the troops to the position of second class citizens, or even property of the state. There is NO in-between. Discipline and military coherence be damned. Either these men and women have First Amendment protections and are full citizens or they are mechanisms of the government whose civil liberties have been erased."
Powers of Unimaginable Scale Work In Complete Secrecy Without a Public Accountability and Enjoy Legal Free Hand
"The Rise of the Military’s Secret Military
Born of a failed 1980 raid to rescue American hostages in Iran (in which eight U.S. service members died), U.S. Special Operations Command was established in 1987. Made up of units from all the service branches, SOCOM is tasked with carrying out Washington’s most specialized and secret missions, including assassinations, counterterrorist raids, special reconnaissance, unconventional warfare, psychological operations, foreign troop training, and weapons of mass destruction counter-proliferation operations."
America's Black-Ops Blackout: Unraveling the Secrets of the Military's Secret Military, Tuesday, 07 January 2014 13:11, By Nick Turse, TomDispatch | News Analysis
on August 14, 2017 James Alex Fields Jr., the 20-year-old Army basic training wash-outaccused of running down counter-protesters demonstrating against hate groups in Charlottesville, Virginia, may not have been the only U.S. military veteran marching under the banner of white nationalism this weekend, Splinter reports.
Don't worry if the above video is not playing below is a still image from that video
(Videos like the other postings on the internet that expose establishment's crimes are continuously removed. But not to worry as an increasingly active and growing in number freedom loving members of public continuously add new and mostly better libertarian whistleblowing material all the time )
Published on Jan 27, 2013
Eric Prince the former director of Blackwater is a Knight of Malta directed by The CIA and CFR and York Rite Freemasonry serving The Jesuit Papacy. George W Bush and his father are also both Knights of Malta and there are a lot more including Military Officials & Papal Court Jews who are betraying their own people.
Media Gigant Rupert Murdoch is a Knight of malta too commanded by The Archbischop of NY who controls a 3 US branches of the Knights of malta , Knights of Columbus , CFR and Trilatertal Commission overseen by The Jesuits of Fordham and Georgetown University and The Black Pope who command both York Rite and Scottish Rite at the top
Published on Jun 15, 2012
A collection of clips showing military chaplains and some of the many fundamentalist parachurch ministries that operate freely within the military clearly stating what their real mission is as God's army. Video also shows the mission of these chaplains and parachurch ministries being put into practice.
"All Jesuit soldiers take an solemn oath “to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries..."
It is well known that from Babylonian times to the fall of Saddam Hussein Iraq has been a multi religious society. History before the western invasion shows that Muslim sects , Sunni, Shia and other religious adherents, Christians, Jews, Yazidis etc have been living in peace participating in almost all areas of the economy and national activities. Peaceful relationship and cooperation is evident by the significantly diffused interwoven multi ethnic character of their major cities.
Western invaders lured Shias, with the cash money and false future prospects to work for the occupation forces to help topple Saddam and control anti-occupation rebellious Sunni population. This created a rivalry and enmity between the two major religious sections of Iraqi society that forced both sections to move towards their majority areas as living as close neighbors became risky as apprehensions skyrocketed.
Using one group against the other for spying also tore apart peaceful relationships between Christians and Muslims as Christian Churches & individuals were similarly lured to work with occupiers against the other groups especially Sunni & Shias for short term cash & false prospects. Tensions between Christians and Muslims rose as Muslims discovered Christians Vatican associated Churches are spying and reason behind raids, drones and sniper killings and in many cases aerial bombings by allied military. Many Christian communities were forced to leave their homes and migrate to other safer locations. Such unfortunate incidences of Christian migrations were prominently published in the global media as evidence of Muslim hatred of Christians to create global tensions in societies in other countries. Such practice of using military civilian collaborators and informers is not new and has always been a necessity for foreign occupiers that runs havoc by creating deep hostilities that last for generations if not many centuries. Stathis N. Kalyvas Kalyvas has discussed to seek generalities how foreign occupation accompanies apprehensions generating violence as a product of political actors seeking information and individual civilians trying to avoid the worst but also grabbing what opportunities their predicament affords them.
Exclusive: The Crusader Sub-Culture in the US Military
The US military’s “Islam problem” captured news headlines even before Wired.com ‘s 2012 breaking story about a military course teaching soldiers that the USA was at “war with Islam.” Since 2007 the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) and its founder Mikey Weinstein have diligently documented violations of religious freedom within the military. During that time many of MRFF’s documentation of violations have included cases of anti-Islam/Muslim propaganda and activities.
In addition to these very troubling stories reported in the mainstream press and by rights organizations, Islamophobia Today has uncovered facts indicating that the pervasive “Crusader” sub-culture within the ranks of Islamophobes isn’t limited to internet forums and blogs but also exists within the US Military.
Anti-Muslim/Islam and pro-Crusader themes tied to military-use paraphernalia, including: T-Shirts, insignias, bullet coating, rifle scope cases as well as tattoos inscribed “Kafir,” and “Infidel” have become common within a sub-set of the US military.
* The word used in the above statutes is "Holy See" which means the Vatican Pope, see the Catholic Encyclopedia: "The authoritative acts of the popes, inasmuch as they are the exercise of their Apostolical power, are styled acts of the Holy or Apostolic See".[ Ref: Wilhelm, J.(1907).The Apostolic See. In The Catholic Encyclopedia.New York: Robert Appleton Company.Retrieved September 23, 2015 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01640c.htm]
Field Manual (FM) 3-05.130, Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare, establishes keystone doctrine for Army special operations forces (ARSOF) operations in unconventional warfare (UW). It is based on lessons learned from both historical and contemporary UW operations. It is also based on existing, long-standing Army Special Forces (SF) UW doctrine; recently developed doctrine, such as counterinsurgency (COIN); and emerging affiliated concepts, such as irregular warfare (IW). "
belligerent governments (puppet governments which are hand in glove occupying army)
"UW is specifically focused on leveraging the unwillingness of some portion of the indigenous population to accept the status quo or “whatever political outcome the belligerent governments impose, arbitrate, or negotiate.” A fundamental military objective in UW is the deliberate involvement and leveraging of civilian interference in the unconventional warfare operational area (UWOA)"
Manual assumes 9/11 was a foreign attack by terrorists despite the abundant evidences from the 9/11 incident that show that the act is beyond the capability of non-state groups, all known terrorists, and also could not have been carried out without main plan and execution outside of USA.
"The 9/11 terrorist attack on the United States highlighted the increased danger of warfare conducted by other-than-state enemies."
"IW is about people, not platforms. IW does not depend on military prowess alone. It also relies on the understanding of such social dynamics as tribal politics, social networks, religious influences, and cultural mores. Although IW is a violent struggle, not all participating irregulars or irregular forces are necessarily armed. People, more so than weaponry, platforms, and advanced technology, will be the key to success in IW. Successful IW relies on building relationships and partnerships at the local level. It takes patient, persistent, and culturally savvy people within the joint force to execute IW. "
"The United States must adopt an “active defense-in-depth” that merges joint force, interagency, international NGOs and multinational capabilities in a synergistic manner. This defense does not solely rely on passive measures. The United States must enhance security at home while actively patrolling strategic approaches and extending defensive capabilities well beyond U.S. borders. An effective defense-in-depth must also include the capability to strike swiftly at any target around the globe using forces at home as well as forward-based, forward-deployed, and rotational forces."
Appendix A The Diplomatic Instrument of National Power INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SYSTEM , INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF STATES
"A state is a set of institutions that possess the authority to make the rules that govern the people in one or more societies, having internal sovereignty over a definite territory. The state includes institutions, such as the armed forces, civil service or state bureaucracy, courts, and police. By Max Weber's influential definition, a state has a “monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” By modern practice and the law of international relations, a state’s sovereignty is not conditional upon the diplomatic recognition of the state’s claim to independence by other states. However, the capacity of a state to enter into various international relations and treaties is conditional upon such recognition. Degrees of recognition and sovereignty may vary. However, any degree of recognition, even the majority recognition, is not binding on third-party states. A-3. Within sovereign states, the ruling government uses all of the instruments of national (“state”) power on its own people. The government is the political authority; it establishes and enforces the law, manages and develops the economy and allocates state finances, disseminates state-supporting information and gathers internal intelligence, and relies on the military as the final guarantor of internal state power. "
A-9 [ including this section about NGO in this appendix carries the impression that these can be justifiably employed for the Military objectives. CIA's infiltration and control of NGOs,Charities, funding and operations is well known http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2yv8s0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYKhXefObKQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkIB33CR6A8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=260&v=uV3ElZS9paY ]
"Even though the term NGO implies independence of governments, some NGOs depend heavily on governments for their funding. The EU and the British government donated a quarter of the U.S. $162 million income in 1998 of the famine-relief organization OXFAM. The Christian relief and development organization World Vision collected $55 million (U.S.) worth of goods in 1998 from the American government. Médecins Sans Frontières (known in English as Doctors Without Borders) gets 46 percent of its income from government sources. "
"Progressive critics have suggested that imperialism and NGOs share a fine line."
[Christianity is falsely aggrandized]
"In the case of Christianity, a relevant factor may be that it was among Christians that science in the modern sense was developed. Unlike other religious groups, as early as the 17th century the Christian churches had to deal directly with this new way to investigate nature and seek truth."
" Islam sees all endeavor as god’s will, so scientific endeavor is theoretically unobjectionable. However, particular Muslim observance and tolerance for scientific consensus varies widely in Muslim societies ranging from theocratic Iran through democratic Malaysia to Muslim minorities in the United States."
US Military involvement in the 9/11 is becoming clearer as information about the military drills being carried out on the same time and day are exposed . Former flight attendant turned researcher, truth teller and author Rebekah Roth in a video describes evidences, sworn testimonies of people watching low flying Military planes some time before the incident the same morning.
Notes: There are also few Muslims as Chaplains, however Muslims are not religiously organized under some single interpreter of Islam like the Pope, in fact the majority sect Sunni are against the idea of single interpreter of Islam and there is no equivalent organization for Muslim chaplains like that of Archhdiocese for the Military Services.
Mikey Weinstein in his book No Snowflake in an Avalanchesays that he has “conclusively identified the perpetrators as hardcore fundamentalist Christian elements within every branch of the military, intent on creating nothing less than an army of zombie zealots prepared to fight and die in order to usher in the dispensational reign of Jesus Christ on earth.”
If Weinstein is right, it is disturbing to think of nuclear weapons in the hands of religious fanatics.